Comments on: Playing with Punishment Books

By: Rob

Rob — Wed, 16 May 2007 22:45:44 +0000

Phil: Thanks so much for clarifying. I’m breathing better now!

By: Phil

Phil — Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:59 +0000

Rob, it won’t be THAT bad – the time since last spanking factor eventually decays to zero, and I’m fairly sure that some sort of upper limit was imposed in the programs otherwise, yes, quite alarming results could occur.

In any case, there must be a limit to the size of file it could write – I’m not that stict.

Phil

By: Rob

Rob — Mon, 14 May 2007 12:06:18 +0000

Phil: I’ve just read your comment. What a hoot!! Just what we spankos need – NOT – a computer nerd/geek to calculate a spanking based on all previous offenses -a sort of rolling list of offences as I understand it. So my husband could say, “Now let’s see the record. This is the 4438th time since we’ve been married that you’ve been cheeky. And it’s been 33 minutes since the last bout of cheekiness. Based on Phil’s software program that will be 888 wacks”, or some such. Back to the drawing board with that idea Phil!!!! LOL

By: Tara Tainton

Tara Tainton — Mon, 14 May 2007 05:10:03 +0000

What a revealing tale! So cute and very sexy at the same time.

xoxo
Tara

By: Mandy Muse

Mandy Muse — Sun, 13 May 2007 01:40:42 +0000

It’s amazing to me how detailed my sexual fantasies were as a child, and how many people I’m finding out had equally well-thought-out erotic daydreams.

By: Rob

Rob — Fri, 11 May 2007 13:47:00 +0000

Richard F: It sounds like a game of brinkmanship to me dear. You should have no difficulty in locating young ladies who wish to play!

By: Richard F

Richard F — Fri, 11 May 2007 13:01:47 +0000

I forgot to add that any darts that miss the board add 5 strokes onto the total.

I think it’s better for all concerned if the girl is poor at dart throwing…. as a variation, the spanker could throw. S/he’d obviously be aiming at all the high numbers, which is a bit of a worry if you’ve done something to annoy Phil Taylor or Eric Bristow…

Rob, I think the minor/major decision is down to the individual spanker. Personally, if I were spanking Haron, I’d probably go down the route of everything being a ‘major’!!

By: Amber

Amber — Fri, 11 May 2007 11:27:15 +0000

That provided that Haron (or any girl in her place) is any good with throwing darts… Of course, it’s more fun to everyone if she isn’t…

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 10 May 2007 22:52:40 +0000

Richaard: I’m guessing a short post from Haron next time, busy as she must be at this very moment practising away at her dart throwing skills. For the purposes of the instruction manual, could we try to define ‘minor’ and ‘major’ types of crimes? Would being 15 minutes late considered minor or major, for example. With the possibility of earning ’60 strokes of the cane on the bare bottom’ it seems to me that a girl would appreciate such clarification!!

By: Richard F

Richard F — Thu, 10 May 2007 21:07:36 +0000

For the benefit of Amber and Rob, let us open the Pandora’s box a little further… A fantastic new game, called “Spanking Darts”

Let’s imagine Haron has once again done something to warrant a whacking. First, she throws a dart at the board to determine whether the punishment is over knickers or bare – if she hits an odd number it’s knickers, even is bare.

She then throws another dart to determine the implement. You can construct your own table here – each of your implements has a number.

Finally, she throws for the number of strokes. A minor crime means she throws one dart, more serious crimes mean two or even three darts.

A fair system that if Haron is skillfull enough could mean only one spank over knickers – or (more amusingly) 60 strokes of the cane on the bare bottom.

Anyways… must go and find a dartboard!!