Abel's spanking blog & stories
Two websites have made me laugh aloud in the past couple of days. The first was a newish spanking blog – the wonderfully-named “Getting It”, by Caroline Grey. In one lovely post, she described how as she grew up, her didn’t-know-it-was-kinky-at-the-time imagination was inspired by reading adventure stories:
One morning my mother caught me all tied up in bed. She was bemused, but I was a strange child and I don’t think she was really all that shocked. I explained that I was playing “Kidnapped” and she shook her head at me. She scolded me about the safety of such a thing. What if there was a fire and I couldn’t get away?
…A fire and I couldn’t get away! It was a whole new scenario to imagine!
I just loved that! (By the way, on the subject of new spanking blogs, if you’ve not found your way yet to the delightful Kami Robertson’s equally delightful “On the way of exploration”, I’d highly recommend it).
Later, Google News emailed me a clipping from the Fort Wayne Daily News. In it, a columnist ponders:
Question: Why is spanking and other forms of physical punishment called “corporal” punishment? Why not captain punishment or sergeant punishment.
Answer: Good question. I thought the answer would be easy to determine but after doing a bunch of checking on the Internet, I could not come up with a suitable explanation for the origin of that term. I will keep working on this and invite any help.
I mean, they actually employ people like that as journalists? Someone quickly posted the correct and obvious answer – but I think we should have a competition with a prize for the most innovative answer posted on the newspaper’s page. I’ve started the ball rolling, posting a comment that:
Beatkid’s theory is widely held to be true, but the origins of the word ‘corporal’ in this sense are actually rather older. In Roman days, when whippings were common, it was deemed inappropriate to flog girls with leather whips. So they used a lighter implement, made from the skins of hamsters – or, to give them their Latin name, Mesocricetus auratus corporalus.
My reply’s apparently in a moderation queue, so I don’t know whether it’ll eversee the light of day! But do go and join in the fun!
Rose
February 27th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
I have no idea, really. But I’ve always taken it to be related to the latin word “corpus,” meaning body. So “corporal” in this term would refer to punishment to the body.
Abel
February 27th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Rose – precisely! That’s why it’s so weird that the journalist didn’t know it, and why it’d be such fun to wind them up with alternative definitions
catherine
February 27th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Do you think the journalist *really* didn’t know? Or do you think he was double bluffing because the question was so stupid and thus probably a wind-up?
Abel
February 27th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Catherine – I did wonder, but the rest of his column was so inane that I think he really didn’t know…!
carolinegrey
March 4th, 2009 at 1:04 am
Hey, I’m glad I gave you a giggle. I’ve been behind on all things internet and didn’t get a chance to say hi yet.
I’ve been reading your blog for ages and got a little grin when I saw your comment, and then your post.