Abel's spanking blog & stories
It struck me that the list of records of the Liverpool Girls’ Reformatory, discussed in my previous post, was missing one important category of documents:
Letters, confiscated
Every letter written by the girls to their friends and families would, of course, have been checked by the staff. And any notes complaining about or discussing the conditions in the Reformatory – strict rules, birchings received – would have been confiscated.
Haron and I lay in bed on Sunday morning speculating on the contents of the file – after, that is, I’d given her six cuts of the cane (much deserved for her somewhat inebriated behaviour the evening before). Our conclusion was that the most interesting letter in the archive wouldn’t be one intended for a recipient outside the Reformatory; rather, it’d be an intimate billet-doux from one girl to another:
28 June 1922
My dearest Eileen,
It’s so tough in here. Your kisses mean so much to me. I long for the secret moments we find together, for the gentle touch of your fingers.
With love from your sweet friend,
Flora
A good historian would doubtless correlate the date on the letter with the contents of the Admission Register to identify the girls – both aged 18, it would seem – and the Reformatory Punishment Book:
29 June 1922. Eileen Turner. Indeceny. 12 strokes. Cane.
29 June 1922. Flora Denby. Indecency. 12 strokes. Cane.
Both entries would show the govenor’s signature. The only matter left for speculation would be where the punishments took place. In his office, bent over next to one another, taking alternate strokes? In his office, the first girl called in to be caned as the other listened, trembling, outside the door? Or my hunch: in the refectory, after lunch, bent over in full view of the other girls – the caning both punishment and deterrent?
eliane
June 29th, 2009 at 7:41 am
1) What’s wrong with inebriation? A girl should never be punished for inebriation.
2) The punishment should have been before lunch. And then the girls should have had to spend the entire duration of lunch in the corner, with their skirts pinned up, for everyone to see their shame.
Haron
June 29th, 2009 at 8:45 am
“1) What’s wrong with inebriation? A girl should never be punished for inebriation.”
Unless she really, really wants to be
Indy
June 29th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Glad Abel waited till he had sobered up, too, before delivering said punishment.
Sarah
June 29th, 2009 at 3:47 pm
Indy – A caning is one thing, but having to miss lunch is just cruel!!!
eliane
June 29th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
Haron, fair point… punishment for inebriation is just fine in that case
Jessica
June 29th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Hmmm, I love reformatories…
If I got punished every time I’d be inebriated – well, I’d walk in a funny way*
But punishing before lunch – how cruel!
*which I don’t
Tania
August 17th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Do you have any more information on the reformatory? My great great great grandmother Charlotte Glass was there in 1871 together with her sister Martha Glass..
I would love to find records of their admission etc. but the archives show that the records for these dates do not exist
Abel
August 18th, 2009 at 6:11 am
Tania – we have an book that covers the reformatory and the boys’ training ships. We’ll blog more from it here in due course.
If you want a copy – and it’s only £3.50 – then it’s called “Yesterday’s Naughty Children”. We bought it from some local history society or other – I can’t find the link though. But I’ve searched and it shows up as item 4309 at the following URL, and there’s a link to order at the top of the page:
http://www.mlfhs.org.uk/Bookshop/richard.htm
Amazon also stock it, but show it as being out of stock.