Images of Lowewood

The online spanking soap opera that was Lowewood Academy may have bowed out to a graceful end, but its real-life counterpart is still very much alive. Thus it was that the Reverend Jenkins found himself putting on his vicar’s dog collar on Saturday morning, and heading off for a day’s teaching and whacking.

No doubt others from the lovely group who attended will post their perspectives on the day – the assembly, complete with uniform inspection; the various classes; the goings-on at the bottom of the garden, both legitimate (the games lesson) and naughty (as a certain girl sneaked out for her cigarettes).

I did enjoy my time in the classroom. First up for me was Religious Studies (biblical quotations*, acted out, before a short essay on whether the bible should be taken literally). By the time I arrived to start my afternoon class, most of the girls were quite hyperactive. “If you’d like, you can spend thirty minutes writing lines in place of my planned lesson,” restored order amidst the mischief, allowing us to start on Sex Education.

Clearly, I informed the girls, the key word for them to remember was ‘abstinence’. But the Headmaster had asked me to teach the new syllabus laid out by the Board of Education, in which girls needed to think of sex using the acronym “L.E.S.”:

  • Legal: a short test on the age of consent in various countries
  • Enjoyable: each girl wrote down three things they thought they’d enjoy with a sexual partner, and had to act one of their list out with one of her classmates
  • Safe. If you’ve never seen eight girls in school uniform unrolling fruit-flavoured condoms onto bananas with their mouths, you really have missed out.

In the midst of the teaching came the Father Smith wing: girls sent out of class to be dealt with for some serious offence or other. Three girls came my way during the day; three short, lovely little sessions (including one with Martha that proved rather surreal given the issue under consideration!)

And then it was on to the detention sessions after the final assembly. Each girl was allocated to one of the masters, so that her behaviour during the day could be reviewed and addressed. Jemima was first in to see me; she’d instigated the insurrection in morning assembly, when the girls had sung a quite obscene ditty in place of the school hymn. As a result, the Headmaster had determined that they were each to be whacked.

Was it fair that she received six strokes? Naturally, although I was conscious that Eliane (Jemima’s real-life counterpart) has been feeling less than receptive to whackings lately. The scene felt balanced on a knife-edge: she needed, deserved to be punished, to be pushed yet not too far. (But was I cruel to point out after caning her that there were seven girls around the school being caned as a direct result of her actions? Well, a Lowewood teacher sometimes has to point out harsh truths…)

The eight other girl was going to be caned irrespective of the raucous singing. I’d made young Caoilfhionn wait outside the room, listening to her friend’s punishment – and now it was her turn. She’d finished bottom of the class, with -35 house points; had it not been for her, an entire class would have recorded positive scores for the first time ever. I didn’t doubt that she was a girl with potential: after all, she’d won the much-coveted Father Smith Cup for being the ‘most sporting girl’. And that, I explained, made it even more imperative that I dealt with her severely, to punish her – but more importantly to discipline her so that her conduct would be better in future. Indeed, I’d feel that I’d have let the school down if I didn’t succeed in ensuring good behaviour from her next time.

35 negative points? 35 strokes of the cane. On the bare. Hard, accurate, delivered with intent, lecturing her as I went. Remarkably, astonishingly deep and powerful role play: the chaplain correcting Caoilfhionn, never Abel ‘playing’ with Emma Jane – until it was over and we could come out of character and hug each other tight.

I must finish by thanking the Headmaster and his wonderful secretary, Miss Bellend, for inviting us and for organising such wonderful events. You two are at the fulcrum of so many people’s play lives, and we all owe you a lot. I do hope you’re both as proud as you should be of what you do.

* I do confess that one of the quotations in the lesson, about girls cutting switches from their orchard to punish their servants, was entirely made up – but none of the pupils seemed to notice!

10 thoughts on “Images of Lowewood

  • 7 September, 2009 at 7:11 am
    Permalink

    Our final scene was very intense indeed! Poor Caoilfhionn was almost in tears with the shame of coming bottom again, not to mention the biting 35 strokes of the cane!

    Still it was a fab day and so much fun :)

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 7:20 am
    Permalink

    “But was I cruel to point out after caning her that there were seven girls around the school being caned as a direct result of her actions? ”
    Yes. You were. You made poor Jemima cry.
    (But Eliane thanks you for being fairly gentle!)
    Great day.

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 7:40 am
    Permalink

    @Emma Jane – it was fab, wasn’t it? Glad it was the last thing on the day so we could come out of role and it could be followed by hugs, though.

    @Eliane – yes, but I’m not sure making a girl cry classes in itself as ‘cruel’, if doing so was fair and reasonable!!

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 1:12 pm
    Permalink

    not jealous not jealous not jealous…..

    Sounds like a fantastic day! No surprise that Jemima was organizing epic mischief, or that Caoilfhionn was the “most sporting.” Woulda liked to see some of those acted-out bible quotations : ) To say nothing of the cane…

    not jealous not jealous not jealous no tjealous!!!!

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 2:40 pm
    Permalink

    I am unabashedly jealous, though I doubt Rev J would have got away with making up Bible verses had there been enough American Protestants around!

    (Even I would probably have noticed, and I’m one of those Secular Humanists, much maligned in American political discourse).

    Are clergy members who fail to maintain the appropriate attitude of moral outrage over blasphemous and blatantly disrespectful displays during assembly subject to discipline? I should think so! 😉

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 3:43 pm
    Permalink

    Ditto what Indy said re. American Protestants. We would have raised H-ee-double hockey sticks, and if challenged would have whipped out our pocket KJV concordance.

    But then, I’ve a suspicion that Reverend Jenkins knows his audience and pitches his lessons accordingly. 😉

    As for making girls cry in remorse and contrition – a duty. Carry on, Father.

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 5:31 pm
    Permalink

    Does it count if you’re an American Catholic? Once in Sunday school we had to choose a Proverb and draw a picture with it, and my friend and I chose something like, “Like a crazed archer wounding all who pass by is he who hires a drunken fool.” So we drew lots of bow-and-arrow carnage. We were nine, maybe. Our Sunday school teachers were decidedly more permissive than Rev J…

    Reply
  • 7 September, 2009 at 9:56 pm
    Permalink

    Ok, I don’t know how bad it makes me sound to say that I just presumed they were ALL made up! I may have to go back to Sunday school :)

    Reply
  • 8 September, 2009 at 7:21 am
    Permalink

    @ej You presmued they were all made up? I actually trusted our dear reverend and assumed they were all real. I was quite shocked to find that one was a lie!

    Reply
  • 8 September, 2009 at 9:38 am
    Permalink

    Poor, poor Jemima, it *so* wasn’t her fault, we were all well up for it! You’re mean, Rev J!

    PS. Which super badly behaved individual was smoking at Lowewood?!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *